Services
Company Profile
Engineering
Control Systems
Research
Satisfied Customers
Contact Us
PPC Biofilter
What Is A Biofilter?
How It Works...
Advantages of Bio..
Cost Comparison
Technical Papers
Installations
Submit Application
PPC Industries
What Is A Precipitator
Wet or Dry?
Technical Papers
Cost Comparisons
Submit Application
  Wet Precipitator
How It Works...
Installations
  Dry Precipitator
How It Works...
Installations
More Information

BIOFILTRATION PILOT UNIT STUDY TO CONTROL FUGITIVE EMISSIONS
FROM A SOLVENT MIXING AREA AT
IMATION ENTERPRISE'S WHITE CITY, OREGON FACILITY

Back to Menu

by
Ray Willingham/Scot Standefer - PPC Biofilter
Janice Tacconi/Bruce Bullough - Imation Enterprises (Borne of 3M Innovations)

Introduction

PPC Biofilter, in conjunction with Imation Enterprises conducted a six month pilot study to determine if biofiltration was a viable option for controlling fugitive VOC emissions from a solvent mixing area. Imation Enterprises manufactures medical imaging film at their White City, Oregon facility. This process uses a variety of solvents including methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), acetone, methanol, ethanol, toluene, heptane, and ethyl acetate, with gas stream concentrations ranging from 0 to 100 ppm (as solvent).

PPC provided a commercial pilot unit containing two cubic meters of biofilter media, from which operating data and background information on biofiltration was gathered to evaluate the effectiveness of the technology for controlling VOC emissions from a highly variable source. Although the VOC concentrations were dilute, they represented a significant fraction of the uncontrolled emissions from the facility. This study indicates that biofiltration can be an effective and economical control option for dealing with highly variable VOC emissions sources.

Equipment

The pilot unit provided by PPC is a skid mounted unit, consisting of a pretreatment humidification chamber, followed by a totally enclosed insulated vessel containing two separate biofilter beds operating in series. Each bed contained one cubic meter of filter media. The pilot unit is fully instrumented and all pertinent operating parameters are logged and controlled via a computer control system. Air flows through the pilot unit are measured using orifice plates and differential pressure transmitters. The flows were set using manual gate valves. Differential pressure transmitters were also used to measure the pressure drop across the humidifier and both filter beds.

The moisture content of the filter media was maintained via the computer control system. To monitor the moisture content of the media, load cells are located in the reactor vessels to monitor the weight of the filter media. This weight is related directly to the moisture content of the filter bed. Initially, the control system was calibrated for the load cells to activate solenoid valves which control the addition of water to the filter media. During the course of the study, the control logic was modified so that water was added to the media on a timed basis and the load cells were used to monitor the system.

Pilot Unit Operation

Gas Residence Time
During the course of the study, the pilot unit was operated at a number of different flow rates. Initially, the flow rate through the biofilter was set to provide an empty bed gas residence time (EBRT) of approximately one minute. Two months into the study the flow rate was adjusted to provide a 15-20 second EBRT. During the third phase of testing the flow rate was set for a 30-35 second EBRT..

Media Moisture Content
The performance of a biofilter is directly related to the moisture content in the filter media. Throughout the course of this study, the moisture content of the filter material was measured periodically, and the control system was adjusted to maintain a uniform moisture content. Initially the pilot unit was set to maintain and approximate moisture content in the filter media of 60-65%. During the course of the study, it became evident that the load cell control system was not capable of adequately responding to moisture needs of the filter material and a timer system was incorporated in the control system. The load cells were, however, reliable as monitoring tools for determining stable moisture contents and system operation. During the final phase of testing, the media moisture content was maintained at 65-70%.

Gas Temperature
The temperature of the gas stream entering the biofilter was monitored continuously and controlled as much as possible during the course of the pilot study. Inlet gas temperatures of 4.4°C (40°F), after the humidifier, were observed along with low removal efficiencies. Experience has shown biofilters to be much more effective at temperatures above 21°C (70°F). Attempts were made to control the inlet gas stream temperature using the humidifier sump heater. At the low flow rates (~60 second EBRT) the sump heater was able to maintain gas temperatures above 32°C (90°F). When the flow rate was increased to 460 m3/hr (15 second EBRT), the inlet temperature dropped to 21°C (70°F). At a 38 second EBRT, the inlet gas temperature fluctuated between 21°C (70°F) and 37°C (98°F), depending on ambient conditions.

VOC Monitoring
Throughout the pilot study, VOC concentrations were measured using both a flame ionization detector (FID) and by gas chromatography with a FID (GC/FID) The FID was used in an effort to obtain continuous inlet and outlet VOC concentration readings. The FID proved to be an unreliable measurement tool because moisture in the sample lines, with a high organic content, fouled the detectors. The FID results can only be used to note trends in the data, although the correlation between the FID and GC/FID data was fairly close.

Ambient temperature also affected sample delivery conditions to the FID. Thorough and rigorous design of the sample delivery system with an analyzer intended for continuous duty, could provide the destruction and process efficiency monitoring needed. However, once a stable ecosystem has been established within the biofilter vessel, monitoring the process variables such as inlet temperature and media moisture content, provides reliable information regarding system performance, in much the same way that operating temperatures in a thermal oxidizer are related to system performance.

Waste water drainage from the biofilter had no detectable solvent content and required no pH adjustment before discharge. There was no blowdown of the recirculation water during this study, and at the end of the trial, solvent concentrations were below discharge limits.

System Performance and Results

The results of this pilot study indicate the biofiltration system works well in removing VOCs from the tested gas stream. The biofilter was able to handle the variability in the VOC concentration and composition and still provide consistent, reliable performance. The overall performance of the biofilter throughout the course of the study was 83% removal of the VOCs. During the final stage of the study, the biofilter consistently demonstrated removal efficiencies greater than 90%.

Of particular interest is the resiliency of the system. During the course of the study, the biofilter media dried out and this was reflected in the performance of the system. When the moisture content was brought back in line, the system performance rebounded, in a relatively short period of time, to previous performance levels.

Gas Residence Time
As previously mentioned the gas residence time in the bed was varied between 15 and 60 seconds. Good removal efficiencies occurred at all residence times, but the most consistent removal was obtained at 30-35 second EBRT.

VOC Loading
The wide variability in the concentration and composition of the VOCs in the process gas stream caused some initial concern regarding system performance. Due to this variability, removal efficiencies were not stable and did vary over time, however the system was able to respond to changes and maintain an average control efficiency of greater than 90%.

The availability of regular GC analysis allowed for the evaluation of the biofilter performance on specific compounds. As expected, low molecular weight, highly biodegradable compounds were removed most readily. Alcohols present in the gas stream were removed consistently, with average removal efficiencies of 97-98%. Average acetone removal efficiencies were 73% at a 15 second EBRT, 91% at a 30 second EBRT, and 93% at a 60 second EBRT. Average MEK removal efficiencies were 82% at a 15 second EBRT, 93% at a 30 second EBRT and 90% at a 60 second EBRT. It is interesting to note that the increase in EBRT from 30 to 60 seconds did not provide a significant improvement in VOC removal efficiency.

Of particular interest was the affect of alcohols in the gas stream on acetone removal. When alcohols were present in the gas stream, acetone removal was adversely impacted and removal efficiencies dropped by as much as 10%. Although there was a direct correlation between alcohol concentration and acetone removal, there was not enough data to develop a relationship. Although the preferential degradation of compounds within a biofilter is accepted, more work needs to be done to explore the relationship between specific compounds in a particular gas stream and the removal efficiencies of the specific compounds.

Media Moisture Content
The media moisture content is the single most important variable affecting biofilter performance. During the most consistent period of operation, the moisture content of the filter media was maintained at 65-70%. Unfortunately, gas flow changed and temperature fluctuated during this period and it is difficult to attribute the excellent system performance to any single parameter. However, during the course of the study, there were a number of times the system performance dropped off significantly. During each of these periods of reduced removal efficiency, it was observed that the moisture content of the media had dropped significantly. When the moisture content of the media was returned to previous levels, high removal efficiencies returned.

Conclusions

The biofilter effectively dealt with the emissions from the solvent mixing room. It was able to adapt to the variable organic loading that was inherent in the system and provide consistent removal efficiencies of greater than 90%. Of particular importance, the biofilter was able to respond quickly and effectively to variations in gas stream composition and concentration. Based on the results of this study, the biofilter is a technically and economically viable alternative to more traditional VOC control technologies such as thermal oxidation.

This study also indicates the attention needs to be paid to the delivery of the treated gas stream to the biofilter. To provide the most stable operation, minimizing fluctuations in the inlet gas conditions at the biofilter may be necessary. Of primary importance is the temperature of the gas stream after humidification. To maintain a stable inlet temperature, the inlet duct work may have to be insulated to minimize the impact of ambient conditions. Additionally, if the process gas stream has an inlet temperature, after humidification, below 21°C (70°F) it will probably be necessary to increase the gas stream temperature prior to humidification.

Pilot studies such as this one give a clear indication of the applicability of biofiltration for controlling VOC emissions. Biofiltration will not meet all VOC control needs, but as more commercial installations come online, biofiltration will become an accepted alternative to more costly control technologies in situations were it does apply.

For more information, contact Scot Standefer, president of PPC Biofilter, 3000 E. Marshall Avenue, Longview, TX 75601; phone (903) 758-3395; fax (903) 758-6487.


Back to Menu